OK-Sen: Inhofe sees himself as "the next Pombo"

Today's Tulsa World has a story in which Sen. James Inhofe (R-OK), notable for such leadership as calling global warming "the greatest hoax ever perpetrating on the American people" and repeatedly cutting off Al Gore when he testified before the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee, says that he is "the next Richard Pombo" in that national Democrats and environmentalists have him in their sights and will expend lots of resources to defeat him next November.

I hope he's right!

Like Pombo, the former chairman of the House Resources Committee (since renamed the Natural Resources Committee), Sen. Inhofe chaired an important committee dealing with environmental issues: the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee.  His replacement by Sen. Barbara Boxer is one of the happiest committee turnarounds resulting from the 2006 elections, which as Sen. Boxer so appropriately informed Sen. Inhofe when Gore was testifying, "have consequences."  As the DSCC is prudently warning donors in fundraising letters:

One seat. That's all it would take to flip Senate control back to the GOP in 2008.  And once again, the Oklahoma Republican Senator James Inhofe -- who has called global warming the 'greatest hoax ever perpetrated on the American people' -- would assume the chairmanship of the U.S. Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works.

That certainly gets across the urgency of expanding our tenuous Senate majority in 2008.  But why stop there?  By targeting Inhofe for defeat or at least making him fight, we can prove that we are serious about the 50-state strategy and help build Democratic prospects in Oklahoma, a state that hasn't gone Democratic in a presidential election since 1964 (like Virginia, which as you may recall recently saw a popular Republican incumbent unseated by a previously unknown candidate).  Just as importantly, we can tie up one of the worst senators in the country and at least make him earn his reelection, and at best defeat him.

As of today, Oklahoma's two most popular Democrats, Gov. Brad Henry and Rep. Dan Boren, have both said that they will not run for Senate in 2008.  So who can we recruit to be "the next Jerry McNerney," someone perceived by the Beltway illuminati to be a hopeless candidate but who ends up winning?  Who can be Oklahoma's Ron Sparks?  Is is Secretary of State Susan Savage, a former mayor of Tulsa?  Is it Attorney General Drew Edmondson?  Is it Lieutenant Governor Jari Askins?  Former U.S. Rep. and 2004 Senate candidate Brad Carson?  Someone else?

This race should not be considered a longshot!  Inhofe's approval ratings are stunningly low.  In fact, two polls in late 2006 showed him with net negative approval, one by a stunning 9 points.  The most recent SUSA poll, conducted in November 2006, shows him with an anemic 46% approval and 41% disapproval.

I'd love to see someone from Oklahoma put up a "the next Pombo" webpage targeting Inhofe for defeat.  Let's let Sen. Inhofe be right about something for once--he is going to be the next Richard Pombo.



Display:


Couldn't agree more (3.00 / 1)

Great diary lorax - I couldn't agree more - Inhofe drives me mental in the exact same way Pombo did. I would love us get to the point where we're really targeting the worst members of Congress for removal, rather than just looking for the weak seats (don't get me wrong, I'm ecstatic that Inhofe could be considered weak).

Also, here in Colorado, we'll hopefully get Rep. Udall to take over Sen. Allard's seat.....


by dirt on Thu Apr 05, 2007 at 07:51:54 PM EST

Re: Couldn't agree more (none / 0)

I think Inhofe is a perfect candidate to be targeted for defeat, for environmental reasons and many more.  Oklahoma is a relatively small state, easy to compete in, and if we get a strong candidate and the national anti-Republican mood continues (we have no reason to believe that it won't continue), I think Inhofe is ripe for defeat.


"I do not support Roe versus Wade. It should be overturned."--John McCain
by lorax on Thu Apr 05, 2007 at 08:16:53 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: OK-Sen: Inhofe (none / 0)

Inhofe was first elected to the U.S. House in 1986. In his entire career, he has never recieved more than 57% of the vote, and that was only against a scandal-tarred former dem governor. There is no reason he can't be beaten by the right candidate.


by JRyan on Thu Apr 05, 2007 at 11:11:08 PM EST

A couple ideas (none / 0)

I like Jari Askins. She seems like a good progressive in my book. Maybe that woman who lost to Boren in the 2004 congressional primary, Kalyn Free.


by pbcliberaldem on Thu Apr 05, 2007 at 11:11:58 PM EST

Re: OK-Sen: Inhofe (none / 0)

 I'm probably writing a paper on the changeover on the committee from Inhofe to Boxer.  Anyone know where I can find out about the environmental issues in Oklahoma, the political environmental activity there?


"And so in the place of the palace of privilege, we seek to build a temple out of faith and hope and charity."-FDR
by jallen on Fri Apr 06, 2007 at 02:12:16 AM EST

: OK-Sen: less vulnerable than previously thought (none / 0)

I think the Dems could win OK but the time isn't right to right now, I think we have to wait one more election cycle to win. Inhofe is a tactful person and he says what is on his mind, but that doesn't spell doom and gloom for him in this election cycle.  Unless a top tier challenger comes forth, it is a waste of resources. OR, CO, NH, and MN are the Dems best hope.


by olawakandi on Sat Apr 07, 2007 at 10:23:26 AM EST

Inhofe (none / 0)

But this is not to say that we shouldn't challenge him, lets see if his polls can come done, not likely but can, eventhough he is above 50% approvals.


by olawakandi on Sat Apr 07, 2007 at 10:28:37 AM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.